Morocco vs. Aminatou
A hunger strike in Lanzarote is turning into a serious crisis in and between Spain and Morocco. Center stage is occupied by Western Saharan human rights leader and pro-independence activist Aminatou Haidar. This former prisoner-of-conscience, “desaparecido”, and mother of two, has been a major name in Sahrawi politics since May 2005, when a picture of her smashed into a pulp by Moroccan police officers went viral, as the kids say, among Sahrawi activists. The photo of her in her blood-drenched melhfa became, for them, the first iconic image of the Sahrawi independence struggle, waved as both memento of Moroccan cruelty and as a stand-in for the banned flag. To add insult to injury, she was jailed after the abuse, but eventually released after heavy foreign pressure. Displaying a rather remarkable steel in her spine — whatever you think of her politics, there’s no doubting her courage — she’s been charging in a one-woman full frontal assault ever since, campaigning publicly and frequently meeting foreign politicians and the press, in what seems to be a deliberate gamble to raise her profile and make her untouchable. So far, it’s been working all right. She’s been monitored, harassed, made unemployable and had her family placed under perpetual pressure, but the government hasn’t really had the stomach to touch her personally again since HRW and Amnesty aimed their spotlights at her; remember that Morocco’s overarching strategy is to keep the Saharan front as quiet as possible.
Now, however, a harsher note has been sounded in Moroccan policy against the independence movement, with King Mohamed VI’s speech recently, where he declared that you are “either a patriot or a traitor”. Clearly, the velvet gloves, if such there were, are off: seven leading activists are being hauled off to a military court, and a number of other arrests have been made.
In the case of Aminatou Haidar, she was supposed to return from the United States, where she had received the Robert F. Kennedy Award John Train Civil Courage Prize for her human rights work, but was held up at el-Aaiun airport, after having signed “Western Sahara” as her country of residence — not “Morocco”. (She claims to have done this routinely in the past, without problems.)
This is, of course, strictly speaking true: she lives in el-Aaiun, which is internationally recognized as being in Western Sahara, not Morocco proper, and where there’s even a UN mission deployed to determine final sovereignty. The Moroccan government, however, sees things otherwise. She was stripped of her Moroccan passport (which she had held from birth, having been born in a Sahrawi area of southern Morocco rather than Western Sahara), and forcibly put on a plane to Spain. According to the Moroccan authorities, she herself signed a document saying that she is no longer a Moroccan citizen and threw away her passport to effectively make herself stateless; she denies this. The truth is impossible for an outsider to tell, but one might note that the authorities haven’t in fact been able to produce this much-talked-about document. (Also, Spanish papers claim that Morocco had booked her return flight long before she arrived to the airport, which would mean that the expulsion was planned beforehand, and the travel paper formality was simply an excuse.)
A few days after being expelled, Aminatou began a hunger strike in Lanzarote airport, refusing to move; when they threw her out overnight, she huddled up under blankets in the airport parking. She says she will not go to Spain, or any third country, but is determined to return to her home, dead or alive. The latter is of course impossible as long as the Moroccans refuse to let her in, alive, which they now do saying she hasn’t got valid travel documents (…since they took them from her). The Moroccan press, having gone into one of its Sahara-induced fits of spittle-and-foam wingnuttery, is saying a lot of other things as well — most of it some spikily worded variation on the theme of her being an ungrateful daughter of Morocco and/or a hostile Algerian agent, and oh, oh the irony that she’s demanding her Moroccan passport back. (Which is of course true, in a way, but it’s not as if she’s got a choice; not even POLISARIO wants Sahrawis in Western Sahara to burn their passports, since that would only leave them politically crippled.)
Spain is terribly discomfited by the whole affair. The Western Sahara solidarity movement (which is uniquely strong in Spain, post-colonial guilt and all) has mobilized like crazy around the issue, and the Socialist government is facing a barrage of fire from right and left on behalf of Aminatou. Should she die in the airport, as medical staff in the solidarity campaign claim she may do very soon, it would not only be hideous stain on the country’s image — and self-image — but also a really nasty domestic scandal. The government has tried to give her refugee status or even Spanish citizenship, having presumably secured a promise from Morocco to let her back on a tourist visa or something similar, but Aminatou remains intransigent: she’s not having any of that, she’s having her identity papers back and thank you very much. For a while, Spain apparently thought they had a deal — or possibly Zapatero tried to chicken-race King Mohamed — but a plane sent out to bring Aminatou back was forced to turn by the Moroccans.Adding to the pressure is the rapidly growing international attention, with continual updates from the major news agencies and criticism of both Spain and Morocco from Amnesty, HRW and similar groups, all driven by a sense of urgency and fear that Aminatou really is determined to go all the way and starve herself to death. There’s no doubting that official Spain shivers at the prospect:
The extraordinary power of Aminatou to shame her hosts, whom she has accused of connivance with Morocco in failing to defend her rights and helping to have her sent home, led a Foreign Ministry representative to tell her in the hall of Lanzarote airport that the Spanish authorities did not actually recognize the 1975 Madrid Accords, which saw her territory carved up without any consultation with the local people.
Of course, Morocco isn’t really interested in her dying there either. Sure, the government would like nothing more for her than to quietly pass away, but not while she’s in the media spotlight. There’s also the problem that the longer the affair drags on, and certainly if she should die, Spanish-Moroccan relations (which are quite crucial to Rabat, perhaps less so to Madrid) may take a serious hit, given how unpopular Zapatero’s conciliatory strategy towards Rabat is already in much of his political base. But a humiliating climbdown would really irk the Rabat government, having loaded the issue with so much prestige. Also, there’s the fear in Morocco that caving to Aminatou’s demands could set a precedent: that Sahrawis, or at least their diehard core of independence activists, can write whatever the hell they like on entry forms; or that, if Morocco allows the UN to help her back, or there is some other special arrangement, this could potentially be construed as a chip off of Morocco’s sovereignty over the territory. Both things of course anathema to the government, and to the oolitical elite and the press — although the latter been known to bark on command, and be shut up as easily, when it comes to the Sahara.
All in all, a tough stalemate to break. Spain is working fervently to find a solution — any solution — but Morocco hasn’t budged, and neither has Aminatou, although there are increasing pleas for her to at least break off her hunger strike. The question, now, in this battle of wills between the government of Morocco and a lady in an airport parking, seems to be who will flinch first.
Trackbacks
- Aminatou, Western Sahara and the Algerian Strategy Towards The Conflict « Algerian Review
- Welcome | Project on Middle East Democracy
- Aminatou update « Maghreb Politics Review
- Guest Post: Alle on Gdeim Izzeik and the Western Sahara « The Moor Next Door
- Africa Blog Roundup: Guinea Elections, Western Sahara, Somalia and Piracy, Etc. « Sahel Blog



The Moroccan government is harvesting what it sowed. That’s what happens when policy is left to a select incompetent few with no accountability. The Moroccans are now left with two courses of actions: stay the course and risk further escalation with Spain and the Europeans, or cave in and create a precedent in the way the makhzen deals with dissent. Either way, Haidar and what she symbolizes win. And yeah, Algeria is having a blast… It’s been Bouteflika’s “Best Month Ever.”
Peace
Clearly the whole thing was badly thought through on the Moroccan part (I fail to see the real gains they thought they’d get from expelling her, even if I could understand their point-of-view re rejection of citizenship; if that is an accurate representation). I am not sure how much real pressure Morocco will actually feel. What are the Spanish going to do? There is too much current investment interest to easily push through any real action. Symbolic slaps, maybe…
The whole affaire does highlight the self-regarding incompetence of the overly emotional cretins in Rabat who manage this dossier. I am frankly sick of their whinging on every time I go to Rabat about W. Sahara (for all that I find the idea of a W. Sahara state ridiculous and stupid – the idiocy of 1970s fetishes and colonial rule), the rotted mess is hardly worth the money poured into it.
There is a bit more to it. Because if Aminatou dies, the cease-fire will be gone according to the Polisario representative to the UN, Ahmed Bukhari and also secretary-general Taleb Omar.
Also Spain is not alone in handling the affair for Spain is part of the EU.
Not bloody likely mate, that’s pure agitprop whankery.
the Lounsbury — What are the Spanish going to do? There is too much current investment interest to easily push through any real action. Symbolic slaps, maybe…
I think if they’re going to do something, Western Sahara diplomacy would be where. It’s the soft spot they always go for when Morocco causes them trouble on immigration or Ceuta/Melilla or whatever else. Then of course, Morocco could respond on economic or security cooperation or something that really matters to Spain, but to seriously mess up relations would not be in either side’s interest. Perhaps there’s also something they could hold up in EU talks (Spain is the upcoming chairman).
van Kaas — I strongly doubt it. They declare the death of the peace process about once a month it seems, but they’re not in any shape to seriously take on Morocco again, and it would threaten to wipe out their movement in the interior. (Although Morocco might do that anyway.) Also: Taleb Omar is prime minister of RASD, not secretary general of POLISARIO (that’s Moh. Abdelaziz).
Hwjm, yes. Taleb Omar got another job by translation, sorry.
The cease-fire will be gone if she dies for sure. However cancelling a cease-fire is something which is not done easily. The reason you have heard so much talk before about the issue is because they have been discussing it for a long time. The 12th congress of Polisario in 2007 had it on the agenda.
What use is a cease-fire if gives Morocco the opportunity to spit in their face all the time? Of course a cease-fire can’t be revoked without a very good reason and Aminatou is threatening to give them one good occasion. I can not imagine Polisario engage peace talks “with her carcas on the table”. Can you?
van kaas:
The ceasefire was conditioned by the organization of the referendum. So technically, the ceasefire can broken at any time without any seeming legal consequences for the POLISARIO (but then there’s the interpretation of the text and the fact that the Security Council resolutions trump any other treaty or customary law…)
However, If Haidar dies because of the hunger strike [[(I wouldn't be surprised if she's the victim of a mysterious car crash or heart attack in the future)]] the POLISARIO could declare the ceasefire over which history shows us, is never a good idea, especially on the part of a stateless “insurgency”, no matter how rightful their cause is. The POLISARIO understands this very well, and so does Morocco. The peace talks were and will be void of any substance, and sitting at the negotiations table is only to comply with SC resolutions. The POLISARIO benefit more from sitting because it is a legitimizing tool and they will do so gladly (with a saddened and defying tone of course), even if Haidar passes away.
The real impact of this crisis pertains to this unprecedented international solidarity with Haidar and the Sahrawi cause, and its already making the Moroccans sweat.
Peace
Mate, “unprecedented solidarity”
That’s bloody whanking.
Here, news to the Activists.
NO ONE IN REAL POWER GIVES A FLYING FUCK ABOUT THE WORTHLESS FUCKING SAHARA.
Relative to the investment and other concerns (security notably), W. Sahara is a pathetic side show.
PATHETIC SIDE SHOW.
That Algeria and Morocco continue to piss away millions on this pathetic dispute is also fairly pathetic.
Sure Analitikis, the cease-fire is simply an agreement in the peace-process which is monitored by the UN through MINURSO. You know, the UN mission also for the referendum. Now Morocco cancelled the referendum, they don’t want it anymore and are not going to co-operate on it.
Polisario wants the UN to monitor the human rights but they are not going to do that. So what use is that MINURSO? It protects Morocco’s investments. It is a guarantee for Morocco’s tourist bussiness – “come.. it is safe here” – nothing else. It will be a reality check for Morocco which is not feeling the consequences of the stalemate. Not as the refugees do – for a very long time now.
Cancelling it will not hurt Polisario as much as it will hurt Morocco and it will get useless MINURSO out of the way.
Nothing better than armchair revolutionaries spilling other people’s blood. Useless asshole.
Interesting blog and discussion.
Aminatou Haidar however had received The Civil Courage Prize 2009 from the Train Foundation when she was on her way home from the USA, and not the Robert F. Kennedy award as you wrote. She received the latter in 2008.
According to the Moroccan authorities, Haidar herself signed a document saying that she is no longer a Moroccan citizen and threw away her passport to effectively make herself stateless. As you yourself point out this is an allegation which is rather easy to refute by simply asking: “So, where is the document???”
@Lounsbury: Of course power people do not really care about Western Sahara. They do not care about anything humane.
Politicians however, in non-totalitarian countries like for example Spain, do care about being reelected. That is how they get their power, through elections. And contrary to politicians in countries like Morocco, they will not be reelected without popular support.
So, the solidarity movement can be (and is in this case) a real power to count with. The Spanish socialist party sent their secretary for social movements, Pedro Zerolo, to talk to Aminatou Haidar last week. That was not a coincidence.
Morocco: A Line In The Sand E-mail
HASSAN MASIKY
Washington, Dec. 6,09 Morocco has drawn a line in the sand! Polisario supporter Aminatou Haidar will not be allowed to return to Morocco unless she apologizes to the King and confirms her Moroccan citizenship. Haidar willingly and premeditatedly renounced her Moroccan citizenship, and then went on a hunger strike to protest the consequences of her own actions. Morocco has neither a legal responsibility nor a moral obligation for Aminatou’s behavior.
As the pressures mount on Rabat to take back Haidar, Moroccans from all walks of life and across the political spectrum have rallied to support the government decision to expel the Polisario supporter. This incident have shown the world and the Algerian military establishment the strength and unison of Morocco’s interior front on the face of outside pressures to force Morocco to compromise on the issue of the Moroccan Sahara.
read more:
http://www.moroccoboard.com/viewpoint/68-hassan-massiki/781-morocco-a-line-in-the-sand
Well, that’s what I would call pure agitprop whankery. But it is revealing where it speaks about:
“the strength and unison of Morocco’s interior front” .
So Morocco has an interior front, so they wage war against the interior enemy. Poor Moroccan people…
This kind of writing shows it is not possible to have a reasonable discussion with this lot, let alone fruitful peace-talks.
By the way. Analitikis’ remark about a stateless “insurgency” is not correct for RASD is a state. Not for Moroccans ofcourse but for others it is.
Oh please, stop being such a bloody activist whanker.
This is the very picture of a stateless insurgency. There is not RASD state in the sense of say there is a Moroccan state, or a Dutch state, etc.
That is not a bloody fucking comment on legitimacy, it is an empirical fact. Polisario / RASD is an aspirational state, and thus very much a non-state actor.
I really don’t know who is stupider, people like you or the Moroccan Makhzen whankers. You’re both drooling idiots in any case.
[ sorry Alle ]
Lounsbury, if I may address you like you do to me, fucking asshole and stupid whanker you should look with your drooling idiot logic at the bloody fucking empirical fact of, lets say the state of the refugee camps. These are organised. This organisation has a name. Also the non-Moroccan area of Western Sahara is a territory organised and under control of a state. And we see this organisation being represented by embassies in a lot of nations. This organisation also signed treaties. I am not aware of military alliances, probably because they are kept secret.
Anyway.. do you realise you are writing like a fucking asshole and stupid whanker and bloody fucking drooling idiot? You don’t seem to have the capacity to emotionally cope with facts that do not fit your ehr.. fucking asshole stupid whanker bloody drooling idiot logic, do you? It paints a very nervous picture.
No need to apologize to me. I’d prefer if everyone was nice to everyone, though, but you two do as you please.
Laroussi — Thanks for the correction about the name of the prize. Amended the post.
It clear
It impossible for An Arabic republic Sahraoui to exist in south of Morocco. why exactly south of Morocco, why not south of Algeria. I think there is Saharaoui people lived there before who merit to be independent . A people who are real sahraoui culturally and even historically are Touareg. I will not say that there is relationship between the crown and the saharaoui people to claim for the sahara, things are more than that. The people who claim now that the sahara are their land are Bedouins who lived before trough the vast sahara from Algeria to libia, they don’t have right to state republic in North Africa with flag not suitable to North Afica, if they want that, they have to look in the Middle east for their Republic. Morocco have to change their policy toward those people if they want to live as Moroccan Citizen they are welcome, if not they have to take their tents and look for another land. As free a citizen from GUELMIM, we will fight to the end for the sahara as a Moroccan, whatsoever the government are in the North.
Moh. B — The whole case is about international law, as per the 1975 verdict in the International Court of Justice, not about setting up states at random. There are plenty of peoples around the globe who would like to have their own state (I wouldn’t mind one myself), but not so many that have some sort of legal case for self-determination The Sahrawis of the Western Sahara territory — whose tribes were most certainly not living in Libya — do, as has been recognized by the ICJ, the UN Security Council, General Assembly, and virtually all world governments except Morocco.
That doesn’t have to mean independence, of course (perhaps it would even be a sound idea for them to decline), but whether they’d like to be independent or part of Morocco is not really my business: they have a right to decide for themselves, without compulsion from either Morocco or Algeria.
That’s the right-and-wrong angle. Add intensive Algerian proxy meddling and chauvinist bravado on both sides for a fuller picture of the actual conflict.
Also:
AFP – La militante pro-Polisario Aminatou Haidar a cessé vendredi sa grève de la faim et pourrait quitter l’Espagne pour le Sahara occidental par avion dans la soirée, a indiqué à l’AFP une source policière à l’aéroport de Lanzarote (Canaries).
“Elle a arrêté sa grève de la faim”, a déclaré cette source qui a dit “croire” qu’elle allait s’envoler dans la soirée à bord d’un petit appareil en direction de Laâyoune, au Sahara occidental.
Cette information n’a pu être confirmé immédiatement auprès du gouvernement espagnol et de l’entourage de la militante.
At least Alle has some rational and GROUNDED comments.